Nicole Kidman is one of my favorite actresses because I think she is so fearless – nothing stops her from making any of her characters authentic. She does whatever she needs to do, she isn’t afraid to get her hands dirty to get the job done. On Karyn Kusama’s ‘Destroyer,’ a lot of people have commented on how she altered her looks to make herself look unattractive – mousy brown wig, unclear skin. But that is just the beginning of how she transformed into the character of Erin Bell. Ever the thinking actress, there’s a lot more to the character – the low voice, the ticks and mannerisms. And Kidman is tough and convincing, both badass and vulnerable, and is fascinating to watch.Erin Bell is never a non-three dimensional character – it lives and breathes right before our eyes. As a detective who was burned years ago in an operation, Bell struggles to find her way when shady characters from the past come back into her life.
The story is pretty simple, but Kusama gives the film a specific feel that it never feels stale. We are transported in a world of sun-drenched and lived-in Los Angeles, and for me it feels familiar and foreign at the same time. That said, I wish I was into it more – this just isn’t my kind of story, and the film did not engage me as much as it should have. And while I commend Kidman and her performance (probably one of the best in her career) I just wasn’t in love with the film.
‘The Killing Of A Sacred Deer’ is directed by Yorgoss Lanthimos, who directed ‘The Lobster.’ I cannot remember if I liked ‘The Lobster,’ (I guess I did, because I rated it four stars on Letterboxd) but I still remember that movie vividly – its weirdness was both amusing and disturbing.
I feel the exact same way about ‘The Killing Of A Sacred Deer.’ here I am, almost a day after seeing it and I can still see some scenes vividly in my head. I am still thinking about the ending, and last night I started to google what other people thought about it. I know the initial inspiration is from a Greek tragedy (Iphiginia in Aulis) but the film is very modern, and it plays with your mind. I know if it should play like a dark comedy, but for me it is just dark and disturbing. It isn’t horror in the strict sense (I was apprehensive in seeing it because of that) but it scares you.
Colin Farrel is fantastic, and is in the center of the piece. He plays a doctor who befriends the son of a patient who dies on his operating table. From the beginning you know there is something ‘off’ about their relationship, and if I say more it would be a spoiler. And is there a more fearless actress than Nicole Kidman. She is fantastic here, as the wife who sees her family disintegrate before her eyes. And Barry Keoghan is a revelation here – innocent, creepy, that little kid you thought you could squash but is more than a menace. There are some unbelievable circumstances in the plot here, but in these actors’ hands, you just go along for the ride.
I don’t know if everyone will like this movie, of course. But I bet it will creep you out, and I bet, like me, you will be thinking about it days after seeing it.
I did not know until after I saw Sophia Copolla’s ‘The Beguiled’ that it is a remake of a 1971 film (starring Clint Eastwood) which was based on a 1966 novel by Thomas Cullinan. In fact, I did not know much about the film, even though I saw the trailer numerous times. I remember thinking it’s some sort of a Southern Gothic horror film, so I had trepidation about seeing it. Alas, it opened around the time I was going on vacation, so I conveniently filed the movie out of my mind….until now, when I have finally seen it.
To be honest, I don’t really know how I feel about it. My first reaction is that I am left cold by it. This is a story of a bunch of Southern girl students all in one house, when one of the girls chances upon a wounded Yankee soldier in the woods, and takes the man home. Under the supervision of Martha (Nicole Kidman) they take care of the soldier, until circumstances change the balance of power in the house.
There’s a lot of subtlety in the film, and Kidman delivers a truly fine performance (I mean, is there anything this woman cannot do?) but I was looking for more story here. But then perhaps I am missing the point of the whole film. This is probably the kind of movie that needs to be seen several times in order to fully grasp what it intends to say but sadly, I don’t know if I have more investment in the film to do that. But I do like Coppola’s light directorial touch, and the film is very pretty experience, with great cinematography that makes you feel like you are inside the house.